Variation of Employment Contract Case Law Uk

The UK Employment Contract Law has undergone several changes over the years, and one of the significant aspects that have been subject to numerous cases is the variation or amendment of employment contracts.

Employment contracts are crucial legal agreements that govern the relationship between employers and employees. They outline the rights and responsibilities of both parties and provide a legal basis for the employment relationship. The law permits employers to vary employment contracts under certain circumstances, but they must do so in a fair and reasonable manner.

The first case to consider is Hartley v King Edward VI College, where the employer sought to vary the staff`s contracts by reducing their entitlement to sick pay. The case went to the Court of Appeal, which ruled that the college could not unilaterally reduce the employees` contractual sick pay entitlement. This case set a precedent that employers cannot make unilateral changes to employment contracts without the employee`s consent.

Another case that highlighted this point was the case of Bateman v Asda Stores Ltd. In this case, Asda sought to impose a new contract on its employees, which would have resulted in reduced pay and fewer benefits. The employees refused to agree to the new contracts, and Asda terminated their contracts. The employment tribunal ruled that Asda`s actions were unfair and that they had breached the employees` employment contracts.

In the case of Norman and another v National Audit Office, the employer attempted to vary the employees` contracts relating to their working hours. The employees refused to agree to the changes, and the employer threatened to terminate their contracts. The court ruled that the employer had acted unfairly by pressurising the employees to accept the new terms and conditions.

Employers must ensure that they follow the correct procedures when varying employment contracts. They must consult with employees and provide them with sufficient notice of the proposed changes. Employers must also ensure that the changes are reasonable and do not contravene any statutory or contractual rights.

It is important to note that employers may also vary employment contracts with the employee`s consent. In such cases, the employer must ensure that the consent is genuine, voluntary, and unambiguous. The consent must also be obtained without undue pressure and after the employee has been given sufficient information about the proposed changes.

In conclusion, the variation of employment contracts case law in the UK serves as a reminder that employers must adhere to legal requirements when amending employment contracts. A fair and reasonable approach is crucial to ensure that the employment relationship remains intact and that employees feel valued and respected. Employers must consult with employees, provide sufficient notice of any proposed changes, and ensure that any changes are reasonable and comply with statutory and contractual rights.

Skip to content